Understanding Negligence Per Se in Personal Injury Claims
Negligence is a central concept in personal injury law. It's the legal basis for holding someone accountable for harm caused by their failure to act with reasonable care. One specific area within negligence claims is called "negligence per se." This legal doctrine can simplify the process of proving negligence in certain situations by relying on violations of laws and regulations designed to protect people.
What is Negligence Per Se?
Negligence per se occurs when a person or entity violates a specific statute, ordinance, or regulation meant to protect public safety. In essence, if a defendant breaks a law that aims to prevent particular injuries, this violation can serve as strong evidence of negligence. The law presumes that the defendant's action (or lack thereof) was negligent, meaning the plaintiff doesn’t have to independently prove that the defendant breached a standard of care.
To successfully claim negligence per se, a plaintiff generally needs to prove four key elements:
1. **Violation of a Law:** The defendant must have violated a law, regulation, or rule. This could involve traffic violations, safety regulations, or standards in a workplace.
2. **Causation:** The violation must be a proximate cause of the injury or harm suffered by the plaintiff. This means that the injury occurred as a direct result of the defendant’s illegal conduct.
3. **Intent of the Law:** The injury must fall within the scope of what the law was designed to prevent. In other words, the violation must have created the type of risks that the statute intended to avoid.
4. **Protected Class:** The plaintiff must be a member of the class of persons that the statute was intended to protect. For example, if a law is aimed at protecting pedestrians, a pedestrian suing for injury under negligence per se would fit this criterion.
For instance, if someone runs a red light and causes an accident, the injured party may claim negligence per se based on the traffic laws violated. The law intended to keep roadways safe for drivers and pedestrians, making it clear that the injured party was within the protected class.
Real-Life Implications of Negligence Per Se
Imagine a property owner fails to repair a broken stairwell in a rental building, violating a local building code. If a tenant gets injured due to falling from the staircase, the tenant can use negligence per se to argue that the property owner was not only negligent but that their violation of the building code is direct evidence of that negligence. In this situation, the law presumed that the owner acted without due care just by failing to adhere to safety regulations.
While the premise of negligence per se can seem straightforward, there are also complications. Defendants may try to argue that their violation of the law was excused or that the law does not apply to their specific situation. However, this shifts the burden of proof to the defendant to demonstrate why the statutory violation shouldn't count as negligence.
Conclusion
Understanding negligence per se is crucial for individuals navigating personal injury claims. It often simplifies the legal process by leveraging statutory violations to demonstrate negligence, providing injury victims a potentially clearer path to compensation. If you have questions about your situation or seek further clarification, don't hesitate to reach out to our team at Goldfaden Benson. We're here to help you understand your rights and navigate the complexities of personal injury law.
For more information or to seek assistance, feel free to contact us through our website. Understanding your legal rights is the first step toward resolving your injury claims effectively.
Remember, you don’t have to face this alone—get in touch today!
