Understanding Negligence Per Se in California Personal Injury Law
Negligence per se is a legal doctrine applied in personal injury cases, and it often comes into play when a defendant has violated a law that is relevant to the case. Understanding this concept can help individuals better navigate civil disputes that arise from personal injuries. In simple terms, negligence per se means that a defendant is considered negligent because they broke a law designed to protect public safety.
What Must Be Proven?
For a plaintiff to succeed in a negligence per se claim in California, four critical elements must be established:
1. **Violation of a Statute:** The defendant must have violated a statute, ordinance, or regulation. This could involve traffic laws, health codes, or safety regulations. The specific rule breached must clearly define the duty owed to the plaintiff.
2. **Causation:** The violation of the law must be the legal cause of the injury or damage suffered by the plaintiff. There needs to be a direct link between the law's breach and the resulting harm.
3. **Purpose of the Law:** The injury must result from an accident or event that the statute was intended to prevent. The law must exist to safeguard against the kind of injury that occurred.
4. **Protected Class:** The injured party must fit within the group that the statute was designed to protect. For example, if a law was meant to protect pedestrians, only a pedestrian injured in a crosswalk would qualify under that particular law.
Relatable Anecdote
Consider a situation where a driver is involved in an accident after running a red light. If the traffic law establishes that running a red light is unsafe, that law aims to protect other drivers and pedestrians. If someone gets injured as a direct result of the driver ignoring the traffic signal, they may have grounds to claim negligence per se. The driver’s violation of the law supports the case, implying a failure to act with the reasonable care expected on the road.
How Negligence Per Se Works
When applying this doctrine, the plaintiff does not need to prove the aspects of duty and breach of care that usually form the foundation of a negligence claim. The focus shifts to demonstrating the elements outlined above. The presumption of negligence simplifies the process, allowing the jury or judge to consider the proven facts rather than having to rely on interpretations of what a reasonable person would have done in similar circumstances.
Conclusion
Negligence per se can play an essential role in personal injury claims, especially in cases involving statutory violations. If you've been injured and believe that a more significant legal issue underlies your situation, understanding these principles could be beneficial.
If you have further questions about personal injury cases or would like to discuss your unique situation, please reach out to us at Goldfaden Benson. We are here to help you gain insight and guidance about your legal matters.
Explore more resources on our practice areas [here](www.goldfadenbenson.com/practice-areas/).
