Get 100% Free Advice!

Get a Free Case Review

Get a Free Case Review

Demystifying Negligence Per Se in California Personal Injury Law

Understanding Negligence Per Se in California Personal Injury Cases

Negligence Per Se is a crucial concept in personal injury law, particularly in California. But what does it really mean? If you've ever been confused by the term while navigating a legal issue, you are not alone. Here's a straightforward explanation of the term and what it involves.

What is Negligence Per Se?

Negligence Per Se is a legal doctrine that automatically establishes negligence when a defendant violates a statute or regulation that is intended to protect a certain class of people. Think of it as a shortcut in proving negligence. Instead of requiring the plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendant failed the “reasonable person” standard, the violation of the law itself assumes that the defendant acted negligently.

Key Elements of Negligence Per Se

For a plaintiff to successfully use the negligence per se doctrine in their case, four essential elements must be proven:

1. **Statutory Violation**: The defendant must have violated a specific statute, ordinance, or regulation. This could be a traffic law or a safety regulation.

2. **Causation**: The law’s violation must legally cause the plaintiff's injury. This means there must be a direct connection between the violation and the harm that occurred.

3. **Purpose of the Law**: The injury must be of a nature that the statute was designed to prevent. For example, if a law was created to ensure safe driving practices, then an accident resulting from speeding could be applicable.

4. **Protected Class**: The plaintiff must belong to the class of individuals the statute was created to protect. For instance, if a law aims to protect pedestrians, only pedestrians who are injured can benefit from a negligence per se claim related to that law.

Real-Life Scenarios

Let’s say a driver ran a red light, which is clearly a violation of traffic laws. If that driver hits a pedestrian at the intersection, the pedestrian can argue negligence per se. They would point out that the driver broke the law (red light running), this violation caused the pedestrian’s injury, the law was meant to prevent such accidents, and the pedestrian was among those the law was designed to protect.

The Role of the Court

It's important to remember that while the laws involved help establish the presumption of negligence, plaintiffs still need to show that causation was present. The court makes legal determinations on whether the statute indeed applies to the case, while the jury typically decides upon the factual circumstances.

Need Legal Assistance?

Navigating these laws and regulations can be complicated, and a thorough understanding of negligence per se can play a significant role in your case. If you have more questions about how this doctrine could apply to your personal injury situation, consider reaching out to us at Goldfaden Benson. Our experienced team is here to assist you in understanding your rights and advocating for you effectively.

For further insights on personal injury laws, or if you’d like to discuss your specific circumstances with our legal professionals, don’t hesitate to contact us.

Understanding negligence is just the start—knowing how it applies to your situation is critical in achieving the justice you or a loved one may deserve.

Table of Contents