Understanding Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations
When one party believes that another party has unlawfully meddled in their contracts, they may seek legal remedies for a situation known as intentional interference with contractual relations. This topic explores what a plaintiff must prove to establish such a claim and ensure they receive the protection intended by the law.
What is Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations?
Simply put, this legal doctrine protects the sanctity of existing contracts. If someone unexpectedly disrupts this relationship, it can lead to significant financial harm. Understanding the elements needed to prove a claim is crucial for anyone considering legal action on this basis.
What Needs to be Proven?
To prevail in a case asserting intentional interference with contractual relations, a plaintiff needs to establish several key elements. Here’s a straightforward breakdown:
1. **Existence of a Contract**: There must be a valid contract between the plaintiff and a third party. This could be any agreement where one party is supposed to fulfill specific obligations to the other.
2. **Knowledge of the Contract**: The party accused of the interference must have been aware of this contract at the time they acted.
3. **Intentional Disruption**: The defendant's actions must have led to the breach of the contract, meaning they intended to cause this disruption or definitely knew that it was likely to occur.
4. **Causation**: It must be shown that the defendant’s conduct was the primary cause of the breach or disrupted performance of the contract.
5. **Harm**: The plaintiff must demonstrate that they suffered harm as a result of the disruption. This could include loss of revenue, damages to business relationships, or additional costs incurred because of the breach.
6. **Substantial Factor**: Finally, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant's interference was a significant factor that caused their harm.
Real-World Relevance
Consider a scenario where a contractor has a signed agreement to build a home. If a competitor spreads false rumors about the contractor's quality of work, causing the homeowner to terminate the contract, the contractor may have grounds for a claim of intentional interference. In this case, the contractor would need to gather evidence demonstrating the contractual relationship, the competitor's knowledge of it, and the resulting damages incurred due to the competitor's actions.
Legal Path Forward
If you believe you have been a victim of intentional interference, gathering your evidence and consulting with a qualified attorney is important. At Goldfaden Benson, we understand these complexities and can help guide you through the process.
Contact Goldfaden Benson to learn more about your rights related to contractual claims or to discuss any concerns you may have regarding potential interference with your agreements. Understanding the law is the first step toward protecting your interests.
