Bruins Fan Loses Slip-and-Fall Appeal in Massachusetts

Disappointed Bruins fan outside courthouse after appeal loss.

A recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has upheld a lower court's decision, stating that TD Garden, the home of the Boston Bruins, is not liable for a slip-and-fall incident involving a fan. The case centered around Alexander Raheb, who suffered serious injuries after slipping on a liquid spill during a playoff game in 2019.

Key Takeaways

  • The First Circuit Court affirmed the lower court's ruling in favor of TD Garden.
  • Alexander Raheb slipped on a liquid spill caused by another fan, resulting in significant injuries.
  • The court found no negligence on the part of TD Garden or its cleaning staff.

Incident Overview

On April 13, 2019, Alexander Raheb attended a Boston Bruins playoff game with friends. After purchasing food and drinks at a concession stand, he slipped on the concourse floor approximately 40 to 50 feet from the stand. Raheb fell hard, landing on his kneecap and rupturing his left quadriceps tendon, which required surgery and extensive rehabilitation.

Legal Proceedings

Raheb filed a negligence lawsuit against Delaware North, the owner and operator of TD Garden, claiming that the arena failed to maintain a safe environment for its patrons. The initial ruling by a Massachusetts federal district court favored Delaware North, leading Raheb to appeal the decision.

The First Circuit Court reviewed the case and upheld the summary judgment in favor of Delaware North, stating that the circumstances did not demonstrate negligence. The court noted that the liquid Raheb slipped on had been spilled just seconds before the incident by another fan, and there was no evidence that TD Garden's staff had failed to act appropriately in maintaining the concourse.

Court's Findings

The court's ruling highlighted several key points:

  1. Spill Timing: Video footage confirmed that the spill occurred moments before Raheb's fall, indicating that the arena staff could not have reasonably been expected to clean it up in time.
  2. Concourse Conditions: Testimonies revealed that the concourse was busy, but not dimly lit or hazardous in a way that would have contributed to the fall.
  3. Previous Incidents: While there had been prior slip-and-fall incidents at TD Garden, the court found no pattern of negligence that would warrant liability in Raheb's case.

Implications of the Ruling

This ruling sets a significant precedent regarding liability in similar cases involving slip-and-fall incidents at public venues. It underscores the importance of timely maintenance and the challenges of proving negligence in environments where patrons are allowed to carry drinks.

Conclusion

The First Circuit's decision reinforces the legal protections for venues like TD Garden against negligence claims stemming from accidents caused by patrons. As sports fans continue to enjoy events in crowded arenas, this case serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in personal injury lawsuits and the responsibilities of both patrons and venue operators.

Sources

Share:

More Posts
Categories
KEEP IN TOUCH

Contact Us

Goldfaden Benson injury attorneys San Diego California
Name(Required)
I AGREE TO RECEIVE SMS TEXT MESSAGES REGARDING MY CASE.
By checking this box, I agree to receive text messages at any time, which include hours outside of business hours (8:00 a.m. PST - 9:00 p.m. PST). This is so that we may reach you as soon as possible in order to consult on your potential case. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging. You can STOP messaging by sending STOP and get more help by sending HELP. See privacy policy below the submit button.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.